What the Bible Says about Anti-Semitism

A commonly used tactical weapon employed by today’s Jews and ignorant professing Christians, as well as others, is the label of “anti-Semitism.” With the manufactured cultural backdrop of the “Holocaust,”1 anti-Semitic is assumed to mean anti-Jew. Should you criticize, expose or simply discuss Jews in the slightest negative tone, despite the truth, you are labeled an anti-Semite or anti-Jew.

Modern Definition of Anti-Semitism

Once again, there seems to be a misunderstanding of the term and thus confusion about what anti-Semitism means. Before can have an intelligent discussion about anti-Semitism, we must come to agreement on how it is defined.

For example, a modern definition from an online dictionary says this under “anti-Semitic”:

“Feeling or showing hostility toward or discrimination against Jews as a cultural, racial or ethnic group…” – www.merriam-webster.com/

“Having or showing a strong dislike of Jewish people, or treating them in a cruel or unfair way…” – www.dictionary.cambridge.org

It seems to be the consensus today: anti-Semitic means anti-Jew.

The main reason for this present-day definition is because of the assumption that the Jews are believed to be the Israelites, the physical descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. This belief is held by Catholics, Protestants and other wild religious offshoots. Is that the truth? Are Jews the biblical Israelites? Maybe I would be called an anti-Semite for even questioning that.

Correcting the Definition of Anti-Semitism

Before we explore that question, let’s look at another definition that will take us back to another meaning of anti-Semitism.

Here is what the American Dictionary of the English Language 1828 (Noah Webster) says under “Shemitic”:

“Pertaining to Shem, the son of Noah. The Shemitic languages are Chaldee, Syriac, Arabic, Hebrew, Samaritan, Ethiopic and Old Phoenician.”

So, Shemitic (or Semitic) refer to the descendants of Shem, one of the sons of Noah (Genesis 10:1).  “Anti-Semitic” is not found in this 1828 dictionary, but if it were, it would mean against (anti) Shem or the descendants of Shem. Thus, I must conclude that sometime after 1828 this term “anti-Semite” or “anti-Semitism” was invented and has come to mean anti-Jew. But originally, it referred to Shem.

Are the Jews Semites?

So now the question is, Are todays Jews Semites? Are the Jews descendants of Shem? More specifically, are today’s Jews the physical offspring of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and the 12 tribes of Israel (Exodus 1:1-5) who were direct descendants of Shem (Genesis 11:10-27ff)?

I discuss the history of the modern-day Jews in my book, Identifying Biblical Israel Today.  I detail exactly where they came from and who they are. But one fact stands out. The Jews of today are NOT descended from Shem, but from Ashkenaz, one of the grandsons of Japheth (Genesis 10:2-3).  There are many modern Jewish references that confirm this. Here is one:

The New Standard Jewish Encyclopedia provides population statistics for the Ashkenazim:  “[the Ashkenazim] constituted before 1933 some nine-tenths of the Jewish people (about 15,000,000 out of 16,500,000).”

The Jews are not Shemites (Semites), but are from another line. So, it is incorrect to label someone as “anti-Semitic” if they criticize the Jews. Discard the modern-day meaning of “anti-Semitic” as anti-Jew. It’s not accurate.

Let’s Suppose …

On the other hand if the descendants of the biblical Israelites are the people from white Northwestern European stock, then the label “anti-Semitism” would fit if you hated and denounced these people.  So, in fact, the true anti-Semites today are the Jews, for they have created the greatest identity theft of all time – they have stolen the identity of the biblical Israelites. And then these Jews cry “anti-Semitism” if anyone tries to expose them and their deeds and schemes.

Even now it is a criminal offense in many European countries to criticize the Jews or question the Holocaust. In the United States, it’s not come to the level of an enforceable unlawful act, but it’s right around the corner.

For example, in December 2016, the U.S. Senate passed the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act by unanimous consent. As recently as November 7, 2017:

“…the House Judiciary Committee held hearings over the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act, a bill that would broaden the definition of antisemitism to include criticism of Israel [that is, Jews]. If passed, the legislation would instruct the Department of Education to consider the State Department’s definition of antisemitism when investigating educational institutions for discrimination under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act.”2

Inching toward a criminal offense. So much for free speech!

“Jews” of the Bible

The question often arises, who then are the “Jews” of the Bible? You see, the term translated “Jew” in the Bible leads to confusion. But if you want clarity on that subject, you might consider my books, the Covenant Heritage Series, beginning with the first book, Discover the Story of Your Biblical Heritage.  I go into the biblical history and definitions in detail in this series.

For me, the epitaph “anti-Semitic” as applying to Jews is just another deception invented to protect the Jews and hinder revealing who they really are. It’s to disguise what they are doing to destroy the true biblical Israelites.

And if professing Christians who have just read this still believe the Jews are Semites, and thus are Israelites, you have been misled. But, good news! You now have the opportunity to discover for yourself the historical and biblical facts. Click here for the Covenant Heritage Series.

Lawrence Blanchard N.D., M.Div.

__________________

1 Unless you have researched the facts based on primary evidence about the so-called Holocaust, you will continually fall for the incessant propaganda of Jewish-controlled media and government. The reason for the invented drama of the Holocaust is to ensure protection for the Jews while they rack up billions for “reparations.” See also www.renegadetribune.com/holocaust-story-invented-2/

2 mondoweiss.net/2017/11/antisemitism-disagreement-community/

Posted in Biblical Theology, Current Issues, Modern Christianity | Comments Off on What the Bible Says about Anti-Semitism

What the Bible Says about Racism

Since there is no word in the Bible such as “racism” or “racist,” is there another word or concept that would be representative? To find out the answer, we have to determine what “racism” means. So, let’s do a little history lesson on this word.

History of “Racism”

In respect to the English language, “racism” or “racist” is a relatively new word. It did not exist until the 1930s. Interestingly, the Oxford English Dictionary did not even have an entry for the word until after 1971. The Second Edition, 1989, defined “racism” as “the theory that distinctive human characteristics and abilities are determined by race.” Pretty benign compared to how it is used today.

Let’s look at other definitions as an example of how the meaning of racism changed over time.

“A belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce inherent superiority of a particular race.” (Webster’s Seventh New Collegiate Dictionary, 1967)

This is a general definition, but unclear, as to the reasons why “race is the primary determinant of human traits . . .” Notice just twenty-one years later how the definition changed:

“1. A doctrine or teaching, without scientific support, that claims to find racial differences in character, intelligence, etc., that asserts the superiority of one race over another or others, and that seeks to maintain the supposed purity of a race or the races; 2. Any program or practice of racial discrimination, segregation, etc. based on such beliefs.” (Webster’s New World Dictionary, 1988, emphasis added)

This definition of “racism” has changed from the earlier one by adding a qualifier of “without scientific support.” In other words, if there is no scientific support for claims of “racial differences” or the assertion of “superiority of one race over another,” or if one holds to the “practice of racial discrimination,” and so forth, then one is engaged in racism and is a racist. But what if there is scientific support for racial differences? Would one be a “racist”? No, not according to this definition. In this case, one could assert the superiority of one race over another and practice racial discrimination and not be called a “racist” as long as he could show scientific support for conclusions about racial differences.

Yet another definition adds to the notion of “racism” by including “a policy of government” and the vagueness of “hatred or intolerance”:

“1. A belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement usually involving the idea that one’s own race is superior. 2. A policy, a system of government, etc. based on such doctrine. 3. Hatred or intolerance of another race or other races. (Webster’s College Dictionary, 1991)”

This definition has dropped the qualifier of “scientific support” from the previous one and added some broader based, but subjective, qualifiers. What is “hatred” or “intolerance”? These have become arbitrary words of impression rather than definition.

What if one believed there were “inherent differences” between the races and, therefore, practiced racial discrimination and segregation for the benefit of his own race, but did not hate other races? Would he be a racist? No, not in the full sense of this definition. But then again,k what does “hate” mean?

Even this cursory review of dictionary definitions reveals a lack of consistency or exactness of definition of the word “racism.” And without a more exact definition, the terms of “racism” or “racist” may not properly identify or categorize an individual who may be a racial separatist or segregationist for very good religious or scientific reasons.

Religion on “Racism”

Today, “racism” and “racist” are used and perceived as downright evil. For example, Southern Baptist Convention President Ronnie Floyd said,

“I believe that the issue of racism is from Satan and the demonic forces of hell.  Racism is completely opposite from the message of Jesus Christ; it is completely opposite of the message of love, it is completely opposite of the message of dignity, value and the sanctity of human life. It is completely opposite of the message of reconciliation.” – Nov. 5, 2015

Pretty strong words here. But it may represent the sentiments of Catholic and Protestant religions today.

Many pastors and scholars who believe that the Bible is the written word of God stand in defiance of “racism” because of one primary presumption: that all races originated from Adam. They have concluded that the Bible is a universally-applied book. It’s about all races, they say. So, it only stands to reason that racism is to be hated and opposed – whatever “racism” means.

Theology Rules

But is it true that the Bible is about, and for, all races?

I used to believe that, but I asked the hard questions and then tried to be as objective as possible when I searched for the answers in the Bible. My conclusion: there is no evidence that all races came from Adam nor is the Bible – the key people, historical events or covenants – inclusive of all races. No evidence. None.

That being said, I would also conclude that unless there is a definite and agreed upon meaning of “racism” or “racist” (since there are obviously many different ideas about it), we cannot determine if the Bible discusses the issue.

If, on the other hand, I am assigned the racism or racist label because I believe that the Bible is about one race of people among many, and that the Bible is not inclusive of all races, then call me what you will. But remember what Jesus said:

“You have heard that the ancients were told, ‘You shall not commit murder’ and ‘Whoever commits murder shall be liable to the court.’ But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother shall be guilty before the court; and whoever says to his brother, ‘You good-for-nothing,’ shall be guilty before the supreme court; and whoever says, ‘You fool,’ shall be guilty enough to go into the fiery hell.” – Matthew 5:21-22

You good-for-nothing, you fool – you racist! Be careful.

Let’s be honest. “Racism” and “racist” are created words used against the White people to shame and blame them. They are used by unthinking people who basically don’t know what they so confidently accuse another of.

Just stick with what the Bible says and means.

In the meantime, may I suggest another, more accurate definition of “racist”:

“One who realizes that there are inherent differences between the races and makes choices about his life based on those differences.”

By Lawrence Blanchard, ND, MDiv

Posted in Biblical Theology, Current Issues, Modern Christianity | Comments Off on What the Bible Says about Racism

What the Bible Says about Race

It is widely assumed that all the different races and racial sub-types are not really individual races at all, but are all included in one race – the human race.

Race in Secular Thought

For example, modern-day anthropology, promoted by the Boaz school of thought, teaches there is no such thing as race, as once believed by traditional anthropology. Race is merely a social construct created by society. Nearly all (if not all) colleges and universities follow and teach the Boaz conviction. The conclusion is that all races are pretty much the same except for different physical features. This belief forms the basis for racial equality.

Race in Religious Thought

Although we may consider the modern anthropology view of race as secular, the “Christian” religious world (both Catholic and Protestant) have come to the same conclusion as the Boaz school of thought but by a different set of assumptions. Those who believe the Bible is the written word of God also believe that the following two assumptions are fact:

  1. All races and racial sub-types originated from Adam and Eve, and
  2. All races and racial sub-types were therefore created in the image and likeness of God.

So, the modern Christian world believes that all races are equal because it is assumed that they had the same created origin. They agree with the modern secular world and arrive at similar conclusions based on a different set of assumptions.

The religious and secular systems agree there are no individual races of different origins, but all comprise only “one human race” or humanity. Even non-Christian Hinduism is in agreement with the “all are equal” doctrine. Could it be that eastern religious doctrine has infiltrated both religious and secular with regard to equality?

Race Origin Assumptions Challenged

But I ask the question, “What does the Bible say about race?” The Catholic and Protestant religions have made certain assumptions (described above) that are considered as fact. However, the Bible never said that God created all races from one male and female pair (Adam and Eve). There is nothing in the creation account recorded in Genesis chapters 1 and 2 that directly or indirectly says this. It’s an unproven assumption.

Nor does the Bible say that all the races and racial sub-types came into being from Noah’s three sons and their families (Genesis 10-11). There are elaborate scenarios of how they say the races came about such as through the process of different environmental factors affecting genetic outcomes or an unrecorded miracle. But the Bible doesn’t even hint at this.  Nothing.

So, why does the religious world keep promoting something that the Bible never says? Because they must find a way to make the Bible fit into their universal, “we are all one human race” conclusion in order to justify “world missions.” Because they need to justify their application of “the gospel” to all races in order to be fair.

What the Bible Says

What the Bible does say is this:

26 Then God said, “Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; and let them rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over the cattle and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.” 27 God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.” – Genesis 1:26-27

God created one male and female pair, Adam and Eve (Genesis 2). And from that pair children were born and their successive generations of offspring reproduced (Genesis 5). That’s what the Bible says and nothing more.

The direct physical offspring from Adam and Eve were eventually Noah and his three sons. From their families, their descendants were “scattered” after the flood (Genesis 11). The biblical text says nothing about these families becoming other races. It’s an assumption based simply on the presumption that the Bible is a universal book and that all races are equal.

Why don’t we just take what the Bible says at face value instead of imagining what we want it to say, trying to force it to fit into our worldview of “all races came from Adam”?

Why not consider another possibility? Could it be that God created one race of people, distinct from the other races and racial sub-types, for a specific purpose and plan? Could the Bible be about that one race and not the many races? Would that be a more logical conclusion based on the biblical evidence? And would this proposal be consistent with the facts of genetic science – like produces like?

It’s really very simple. Pure breeding Caucasians produce Caucasians. Pure breeding Blacks produce Blacks. And so on. A cell only reproduces itself exactly, time after time, every time. Like begets like. That’s it.

The Bible is about one race among many in existence today. However distasteful that truth may be to some, it’s still what the Bible says about race.

Do you want to know more about what the Bible says about race? Get the Covenant Heritage Series.

Posted in Biblical Theology, Current Issues, Modern Christianity | Comments Off on What the Bible Says about Race

The Bible Mastery Boot Camp

I am very excited about our new DVD project called the Bible Mastery Boot Camp. This DVD teaching and training series has the potential to reach literally millions of God’s Covenant People across the globe. This is an audio-visual presentation which can effectively teach our People in the privacy of their own homes in order to help restore their lost biblical heritage. I want to give you more details about this DVD project and the vision I have for it. And if you share that vision, I want to tell you how you can help make it happen.

What Is This All About?

The Bible Mastery Boot Camp is a revolutionary step-by-step, systematic training course that can help our People know and understand what the Bible says and means – for themselves. It is a comprehensive teaching of the entire Bible in an audio-visual format. But it’s more than just teaching. It’s training our People how to read and study the Bible by training them to use standard and accepted principles of interpretation. That way, they discover what the Bible actually says and means for themselves. As a result, they own what they believe!

What the Bible Mastery Boot Camp Will Include

This will not just be a DVD all by itself. It will come with an accompanying personal course notebook that can be used along with the DVD. This will allow anyone who is watching the DVD presentation to apply what they are learning and write down the correct answers to each part of the presentation according to what the Bible says.

So, for example, as I teach in the DVD, I will periodically have the student stop or pause the DVD, read a selection of Scripture and fill in the correct answer to a question in the course notebook. My purpose is to engage the student to interact with me through the DVD. This enhances the learning process because they must try to find the correct answer according to the evidence of the Bible itself. My purpose is not to spoon feed them, but teach them how to feed themselves by actually doing it. Does that make sense?

When someone orders a module, they will also receive a copy of the corresponding book in the Covenant Heritage Series that supplements the DVD and personal course notebook. This will be another learning tool offering more details and documentation.

What Can Be Accomplished

The Bible Mastery Boot Camp DVD package will be a “done-for-you” teaching and training series that can be used individually, as a family, or in a small group setting. It creates an important benefit of convenience and privacy.

  • It can be viewed in a home with family
  • Friends and neighbors can come together to learn and grow together – like a home study time.

No one has to worry about trying to teaching anything. All they have to do is make the Bible Mastery Boot Camp available to others.

And what is the main purpose? It is our hope and prayer that the powerful God of our fathers will create His local churches in every land our People live. What if, in a short time the Spirit of the Living God began to move establishing local churches out of those who have been taught and trained from the Bible Mastery Boot Camp DVD presentation?

Can you see it? Is it possible? Yes, that’s my vision!

We Are Ready To Go!

For months now we have been creating scripts and corresponding class notebooks preparing to put it all together with a DVD format. We have had to learn how to actually create a professional DVD presentation. It was a difficult task and the project stalled until we accomplished this.

But now, we are ready to move forward. What we are working on now is an Introduction to the Bible Mastery Boot Camp DVD so it can be used as a preliminary first-step to give to someone brand new.

We are also getting ready to produce four separate Modules containing many classes in each one. Each Module is based on one of my books (Module One is based on Book One, Discover the Story of Your Biblical Heritage). And going through Module One is a prerequisite for Module Two (Identifying Biblical Israel Today), and so forth.

Do You Want To Help Us?

If you are prompted by God to help us with this venture, we would love that. We cannot do this alone. If you would like to offer support for this DVD project, please send me an email at BibleMasteryBootCamp@gmail.com. All financial donations can be sent directly to me (please make out checks to “Lawrence Blanchard”) at:

Lawrence Blanchard, PO Box 485,  Cocolalla, ID 83813

The more support we have, the more time we can give to completing this project.  Any donation is helpful. Thank you! (But please, if you are supporting another ministry, continue to do so. The last thing I want is to take from another worthy work.)

We will be emailing you newsletters periodically with updates to let you know about our progress.

We Are Changing Websites

Our current website, YourBiblicalHeritage.com, will be offline in the near future (before the end of the year.)  BibleMasteryBootCamp.com will be our new website. It is now live for you to explore.

After today, you will be receiving all email newsletters and updates from our new email address: BibleMasteryBootCamp@gmail.com or BMBC for short.

We will have our books available there for you under each title in the Covenant Heritage Series tab and I will be posting articles periodically. If you already signed up to receive my articles in the past, you are signed up. If you wish to be removed from our mailing list, just let us know. You can also unsubscribe at the bottom of each email newsletter. If you have never signed up for my articles and wish to be on our mailing list, you can go to our new website: BibleMasteryBootCamp.com and sign up in the left hand column.

I will also be doing live teaching of the Bible Mastery Boot Camp in northern Idaho. You can see the schedule of the live Boot Camps on our new website. I would love to have you come over and visit us. You are always welcome to sign up for and attend a Boot Camp (Modules One and Two), if you are able to come to northern Idaho. We have reasonable hotels nearby.

by Lawrence Blanchard, ND, MDiv

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on The Bible Mastery Boot Camp

Special Announcement Coming

Next Thursday, October 26, I will be giving you a new and very important update about a special project we have been working on. I want to tell you a little bit about that here, but all I can say at this point is that this is going to be a very exciting project that could have a huge impact for God’s Covenant People globally. This project that I am currently working on could give us the opportunity to effectively get critical teaching of the Bible into the hands of perhaps millions of our People everywhere. You will want to pay attention to this update because we are shifting our focus in our teaching ministry. This will help you keep up with the new changes coming soon.

Writing the Covenant Heritage Series

Most of you are familiar to some degree with my books called the Covenant Heritage Series. But you may not know that before I began writing them, I conducted live teaching classes to groups of men who did not know anything about this new breakthrough understanding of the Bible. I was “field testing” the process and effectiveness of this biblical teaching that would become the basis for my books. I wanted to know if my approach to the Bible worked. As a result of this live teaching over the years, I kept improving and eventually perfecting this teaching process as the basis for my books.

In the past five years since the books have been available, I have gotten valuable feedback from those who have read at least one of the books. While many have greatly benefited, I have realized and identified one big problem and one major difficulty.

The Big Problem

The big problem encountered by some was in reading the books. Not necessarily because the books were hard to understand, but because reading was a problem. Some people have difficulty with reading itself.  Sometimes I have to re-read something several times to really grasp it. (Of course, the stuff I read is not light reading, either.)

I realize my books contain a lot of information and sometimes some people lose the flow and continuity of what is written just through reading alone. And my books are designed to build knowledge upon knowledge. Just reading them doesn’t always cut it.

So we thought, “Okay, how can we unleash the teaching of the Bible along with my books? Why not create a DVD series that would interactively take almost anyone step-by-step in an easy-to-follow approach to help them discover for themselves what the Bible says and means? Would that work?”

In my experience teaching live audiences, I have never failed to see the amazing explosion of the learning experience that people receive. They “get it” because of the way I teach and because it’s interactive.

Obviously, I wish I could do this everywhere, all the time. So, the next best thing is to duplicate this live teaching in a DVD format. This “big problem” with relying on just reading the books can be solved efficiently and effectively. I think many people will really get into it and their knowledge and understanding will just explode. It provides a learning experience on many levels.

Another Difficulty Solved

The other major difficulty that I kept hearing about is this: Many have expressed their desire to share the truth about what the Bible says with family, friends and neighbors, but are frustrated as to what to say and where to begin. You may have experienced the same frustration too.

But, what if you had a “done-for-you” DVD teaching and training series to give to someone?

  • What if you invited some folks over to your home to watch a DVD interactive presentation?
  • What if everybody got so excited about what they were hearing that they wanted to share the same DVD presentation with others?

Yes, I believe it is possible to reach more of our people than we ever thought possible! These DVD presentations can help overcome that major difficulty and bridge the gap.

Can this DVD presentation be that needed tool to help folks like you share the truth of God’s Word with those you know? I believe it can and will!

That’s why I am so very excited about this project. It’s exponential!

More About the DVD Project

I have more specific details about this DVD project coming next Thursday. I want to tell my vision for effectively reaching and teaching many, many more people like you.

I will be sharing what we have already been doing to develop this exciting project and where we are at right now.

So, stay tuned and I will see you next week.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Special Announcement Coming

The Return of Jesus Christ and Modern Christianity

It’s nigh impossible to listen to a typical Christian radio station without encountering two of the most popular topics being taught. They are that Jesus is coming back at some point in the future and the central mission of the church is to go into all the world and preach the gospel. Both teachings are interrelated and interdependent on each other. In other words, you can’t have one without the other. Both must be true. If one of those teachings falters, so does the other. So, let’s dig a little deeper and examine each topic.

The Condition That Must Be Fulfilled

It is contended that in order for Jesus to come again, a certain condition must be fulfilled according to Jesus’ teaching in Matthew 24:14:

“This gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in the whole world as a testimony to all the nations, and then the end will come.” – Matthew 24:14

Before “the end” would come, the “gospel of the kingdom” must first “be preached in the whole world” as a testimony to “all the nations.” The phrase “the end” is associated in the context with “the end of the age” (verse 3), the “abomination of desolation” (verse 15), the “great tribulation” (verse 21) as signs of “the end” just prior to the “coming” of Jesus Christ (verse 30).

Therefore, “the end” will not come and the “coming” of Jesus will not happen until the gospel is “preached in the whole world.” That is the condition that must be fulfilled prior to the return of Jesus Christ. Both the worldwide preaching of the gospel and the future return of Jesus Christ are interdependent and inseparable.

A Critical Assumption

It is assumed in modern Christianity that the preaching of the “gospel” to the entire planet has been an ongoing commission to Christians since after the resurrection of Christ some 2000 years ago (Matthew 28:19-20).  That is believed because of several other underlying assumptions: all races came from Adam and “the world” and “nations” means the planet and everybody on it.

Unless it can be demonstrated biblically that those underlying assumptions are correct, then the widely-accepted commission to preach the gospel in the entire planet to every racial kind and racial mix is suspect. So, the question arises, “Is it biblically valid to understand this commission as ongoing and not yet fulfilled or is this an errant teaching?”

The Question Is Answered

I am in disagreement with the popular teaching of modern Christianity that the so-called “Great Commission” is still ongoing and that it is applicable to all races other than Adamic Israel. In my first four books, and particularly Books Three and Four, I thoroughly discuss the meaning of “world” and “nations.” I show these do not refer to the planet and all races, respectively. These words, in fact, refer to the “world” of Israel and the “nations” of Israel in the biblical context.

If that is a correct conclusion, then the “Great Commission” as typically understood by modern Christianity is now suspect as to its scope. But yet, it is a question as to whether Matthew 24:14 is still ongoing or has it been fulfilled? That question has been decisively answered in Book Four, God’s Covenant Creation, chapter 7.  Yes, Matthew 24:14 has already been fulfilled.

The Return of Jesus Christ

If the “gospel of the Kingdom” has already been preached to Israel, then this condition has been fulfilled in respect to the coming of Jesus. Therefore, “the end” has already come, the “abomination of desolation” has already taken place and Jesus has come again.

The modern Christian understanding of the ongoing commission of Matthew 24:14 is not true. If that teaching falters, so does the teaching of a future time-frame for the coming of Jesus. They are interdependent on each other.

For a comprehensive discussion on the subject of the time-frame of Jesus’s coming, please read Book Six, The Biblical Story of Prophecy.”

 

 

By Lawrence Blanchard, ND, MDiv

 

Posted in Biblical Theology, Modern Christianity | Comments Off on The Return of Jesus Christ and Modern Christianity

The Modern Generic God

One belief that is common to Catholics, Protestants, Mormons, Jehovah’s Witnesses and like religious sects is that God is generic. That is, God is inclusive and not exclusive with respect to all races and racial sub-types. God is, in the end, the God of all. The theory that God is the generic God is not just a modern phenomenon, but has its roots many centuries back.

Modernly, however, it has been increasingly popularized since the Protestant Reformation, the so-called Great Awakenings, and with the modern foreign missions movement. (See The Greatest Deception of Our Time, Book Five.)  Is this really important to talk about? Absolutely! Why?  Read on.

A Matter of What God Has Ordained

The conclusion about whether the Bible teaches an inclusive or exclusive God is of critical importance because it goes to the heart of authority. More specifically, it defines what and who God has ordained to administer His Kingdom here and now. From the beginning narrative of Genesis 1:26-28, God created Adam (male and female) to rule and subdue. That was God’s ordained purpose for Adam and why He created Adam in His image and likeness. Divinely-ordained authority to manifest God’s Kingdom was given to Adam. That truth was also extended to Adam’s racial family line by the command “be fruitful and multiply.”

The order of authority was God first and then Adamkind. That’s the way God set it up. That was God’s Kingdom order of authority.

The Question of Adam’s Race

So, this begs the question: “Did God create Adam (male and female) as the parents from which all races came forth or were they the parents of only one race among other races?” The answer to this question goes to the origin and heart of whether God is generic or not.

Those who believe in a generic God must first believe that He created all races from one set of parents (Adam).  Therefore, all races represent Adamkind, commonly spoken of as all “humankind” or “the human family” or “the family of man.” Not only is this the common belief among “Christian” religious sects, but heartily advocated by Judaism and the political forces of this world system. It is one of the central pillars of the New World Order or New International Monetary Order. Generic “humanity” demands a generic god from a religious worldview.

Contrary to the well-accepted belief in a generic god is the fact that the God of the Bible is exclusive. That is, God has ordained, from the beginning, that He has created and chosen one race among others to be His servant-administrator to manifest His Kingdom. That idea, of course, is hotly contested and denounced as “unbiblical” and “racist” and “White supremacy.” But these are just mindless “name and shame” tactics used when there is no valid theological argument to back up their claim that the God of the Bible is generic. (In God’s Covenant Creation, Book Four, I go into depth on the race issue.)  Believers in a generic god have no valid theological or scientific basis to support their claim. It is an unproven presumption that God created all races from Adam and Eve.

The God Who Does Not Change

Be that as it may, the generic god idea still must also be supported by the evidence that the God of the Old Testament changed when we get to the New Testament. It’s pretty well documented that the God of the Old Testament was specifically the God of Israel – the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. From Genesis 12 through Malachi, God was consistently represented as the exclusive God of Israel, His chosen Adamic family. In that respect, He was not a generic God.

But somehow, modern religion claims that God changed in the New Testament. He is no longer the exclusive God of Israel, but has become the generic god of all races. Now they say that Jesus the Christ not only taught about the Kingdom, but shed His blood on the cross for the sins of everyone on the planet – Israel included. This, despite the fact that Jesus actually said: “I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel” (Matthew 15:24). His blood was shed to ratify the New Covenant (Luke 22:20) which was for the house of Israel and the house of Judah (Jeremiah 31:31-33; Hebrews 8:8-10).

And there is not one shred of evidence in the rest of the New Testament to indicate that God changed and now opened up His redemptive work to all the other races. How about the “Gentiles” that were “grafted in”? Glad you asked. Discover the Story of Your Biblical Heritage, Book One, is a great place to get those questions answered.

God said, “For I, the Lord, do not change” (Malachi 3:6) and “Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today and forever” (Hebrews 13:8).

It’s About Authority

So, what’s the point of all this discussion? God’s Kingdom was ordained from the beginning to be manifested in and through the Adamic race – not many races. The Adamic family of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob was chosen and redeemed to be His People to bring in His Kingdom of righteousness, justice, order and peace.

Apart from that plan and purpose, His Kingdom cannot be realized here and now.

The generic god is a powerless god. The generic god is a god created in the imagination of men. The generic god is a false god because the idea has zero biblical foundation. The generic god is a gross violation of the first commandment – “You shall have no other gods before Me” (Exodus 20:3).

When we are ready and willing to repent of this sin and embrace the True and Living God, then God will begin to work in and through His Covenant People. And this wicked world system we complain so much about will be defeated. Until then, expect the worst.

By Lawrence Blanchard, ND, MDiv

Posted in Biblical Theology, Modern Christianity | Comments Off on The Modern Generic God

Behind the Human Rights Movement Deception

There is a well-disguised veil that hides the true nature and intent of the “human rights” movement. It is now reinforced by modern religion that labels itself “biblical Christianity.” There is a growing, ever-present network of human rights watch dogs patrolling the landscape ready to expose and denounce anyone or anything that remotely might suggest “White supremacy.” Of course, it’s always that, isn’t it? It’s always about the evil White people who “hate” other races – right? And the “human rights” trolls know how to put White people in their place with tactics such as “name and shame” with full media access and approval. But is the human rights movement about protecting and advancing the rights of all races and cultures?

On the Surface

If you read through the UN’s “Universal Declaration of Human Rights,” one can be constantly impressed with fine-sounding declarations:

“…the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family… human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want … universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms…” – Preamble

That all sounds great. But you have to go beyond the document itself to understand the real purpose and intent of such rhetoric.

Context of “Human Rights”

Unless you understand the context behind the human rights movement, you will not see the veil of deception. First, the “Universal Declaration of Human Rights” is an integral part of the United Nations. The United States (federal government) is a “permanent member” of the United Nations. So, the present United States federal government has subscribed to honor and promote the human rights agenda. We see that carried out as laws and policies to enforce “equality” of just about everything now.

Second, the United Nations is loosely tied to the private International Monetary Fund and the United States federal government is the majority stockholder in it. The government has enlisted the private Federal Reserve banking system as a “fiscal depository” of the IMF by which “income taxes” are collected to pay the interest on a fraudulently created debt of trillions of “dollars.”

The question is: What does all this have to do with “human rights”?

A Usury Debt System

The United States federal government and the international monetary system is primarily controlled by the IMF and World Bank, including a network of interlocking “banks.” This network system was created and is sustained by the control and use of “money.” Specifically, the system owes its existence to creating “money” out of thin air with a few strokes of a keyboard in order to loan “money” to governments, businesses and individuals. Additionally, interest (usury) is attached to these loans which may seem okay in the short term, but mathematically is impossible to pay off in the long run, resulting in default.

So, the banking system, in order to survive, needs an inexhaustible stream of borrowers. Hence, the system seeks all individuals (of all races), businesses and governments to bring into a permanent position of dependency through debt – the borrower is slave to the lender. In order to achieve that, there must be equality of all races so that all may be accepted as equals, particularly in all White nations. Why? Because if the other races immigrate and live in these White nations, then there will be more borrowers. And the other non-White countries must also be brought into the fold through the same monetary system.

And then let’s not forget the objective of the human rights movement: to work toward “redistribution of wealth.” That means, the civilized, wealthy White nations must now, in the name of human rights, give up their wealth for others and, in the end, be saddled with their debt as well.

This plan works just fine for the banking elite, as it helps sustain and ensure their system. Human rights is just one of the necessary means to their end goal: the complete dominion of the entire planet.

1861-1865

The same thing happened as the real reason for the War of Northern Aggression. The so-called “Civil War” was not about ending slavery. It was about the northern banking establishment eliminating the prosperous, debt-free southern states as competition. It was about creating more borrowers in their usury debt system by “freeing the black slaves” and by the “Reconstruction” of the southern states, bringing them to heel.

In effect, through that war, the banking system was able to create a whole bunch more slaves by their unlawful monetary system.

So, you see, the human rights movement is not about securing humanitarian rights for all “human beings.” It’s about making everyone slaves to be used, abused and controlled by the international banking establishment. Don’t buy into all the propaganda about equality and integration of races and cultures. It’s a scheme of deception. And in reality, the promoters of “human rights” are knowingly or not, the very perpetrators of “hate” that they accuse others of – especially when it comes to the White race. I call them “useful idiots.”

By Lawrence Blanchard, ND, MDiv

 

Posted in Current Issues, Modern Christianity | Comments Off on Behind the Human Rights Movement Deception

Red Pill Expo and “White Supremacy”

My wife and I recently attended the first annual Red Pill Expo held in Bozeman, Montana. The tagline was: “Because you know something is wrong.” It was attended by nearly 600 people and featured many speakers. A variety of topics were discussed challenging major issues of the day such as global warming and the green movement, money and economics, income tax, health care, 9/11 and so forth. It was very well organized and well worth our time to attend.

Covering this event was the Bozeman Daily Chronicle which posted an article: “Activists: Convention in Bozeman is ‘alt-right’ recruitment effort.” The article alluded to the Montana Human Rights Network and co-director Rachel Carroll Rivas who said “the wide-ranging topics are purposefully designed to recruit people to White supremacist or ‘alt-right’ causes.”1 So, this article was implying that the Red Pill Expo was overtly or covertly designed as a White supremacist event. “White nationalist” was also mentioned.

The Red Pill Expo

The website of the Expo had as its purpose to “help you break free from the avalanche of propaganda, fake news and outright deception, and to embrace reality for a better life.” That’s exactly what the Expo fulfilled.

So, what about this media and “human rights” accusation that the Red Pill Expo was really about White supremacy? Apparently, they didn’t realize that two of the speakers were not White. Sherry Jackson was a Black female, a former CPA who was put in prison for three years on a misdemeanor for exposing the IRS and its fraudulent income tax system. Another speaker was Robert Kiyosaki, famous author of “Rich Dad, Poor Dad.” He is Asian.

How is it, then, that the media and Montana Human Rights Network labeled this a recruiting event for alt-right and White supremacy? Are they stupid? No, they are not stupid. They know exactly what they are doing. They don’t care about truth. They care about fulfilling their mission to counter any person, event or movement with a “name and shame” tactic. Why? To dissuade anyone else from finding out about what’s really going on out there. If these radical, Bible-hating liberals can label someone or something “White supremacy” they know they can scare people away. After all, who wants to be labeled as a “White supremacist”? It’s the worst possible epithet that can be pinned on someone. Conventional media and so-called human rights organizations use their best tactic: smear. Who cares about truth?

Social Engineering

The reason that most White people react and avoid any association with “White supremacy” is the result of decades of carefully-planned social engineering. I discuss this in my book, The Greatest Deception of Our Time. This includes religion, government, education and media efforts to inseparably connect White nationalism and racial interests with White supremacy, Nazism, the KKK, slavery, anti-Semitism (read anti-Jew) and, of course, hate.

And anyone or anything that smacks of views antithetical to mainstream government and media propaganda is slapped with the label “White supremacist.” It’s a tactic. It’s meant to be perceived as the ultimate condemnation. It is hoped that you will run away as fast as you can. White people have been programmed to do so.

The “Human Rights” Movement is Anti-White

The Human Rights Movement is a hypocritical fraud. Supposedly based on the “Universal Declaration of Human Rights”2 out of the United Nations, there are a number of Articles explaining what “human rights” is all about. I’ll just cite four examples and apply it to White people and their historic nations.

Article 3.   Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.”

Does that apply to White people? What if White people prefer to be with their own kind, provide schools for their own children and desire to secure a homeland for themselves to protect their own life, liberty and security? No, that’s forbidden to White people.

Article 8.   Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.”

White people are not allowed a “remedy” for their “fundamental rights” to secure a separate homeland and other necessities for life, liberty and security.

Article 15.    (1) Everyone has the right to a nationality.”

A right to nationality? Are you kidding? How about forced immigration of non-Whites into White countries? Whites have no such right. This doesn’t happen in China or Japan – only in historic White countries.

Article 18.   Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.”

Whites are not allowed to express their thoughts about race if it’s contrary to the equality and diversity movement. And if they do, they are labeled “White supremacists.”

White Supremacy

What exactly is “White supremacy”? It’s been defined for us. Here are a couple of modern definitions:

“White supremacy: The social, economic, and political repression and exploitation of nonwhite peoples, esp. blacks, by White people, based on notions of racial superiority.” – www.yourdictionary.com/White-supremacy

“White supremacist: An advocate of White supremacy, a person who believes that the White race is inherently superior to other races and that White people should have control over people of other races.” – en.wiktionary.org/wiki/White_supremacist

Repression and exploitation and control over nonwhite peoples?  I don’t know any White person who wants to repress and exploit other races. I do know White people (including myself) who want to be left alone. I do know White people who seek out their own kind and prefer their own churches and schools. I know White people who want their own nation. But, of course, that’s White supremacy. If you don’t join in the equality and diversity hoopla – you’re a White supremacist. A racist. A hater.

The truth of the matter is that those self-righteous “human rights” groups are racist haters of White people. Period.

By Lawrence Blanchard, ND, MDiv

__________________

1 http://www.bozemandailychronicle.com/news/activists-convention-in-bozeman-is-alt-right-recruitment-effort/article_ce7529e7-6028-55b4-bd9b-79dc97c229a6.html

2 http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/index.html

 

Posted in Current Issues | Comments Off on Red Pill Expo and “White Supremacy”

Alt-Right Condemned by Southern Baptists – Part 2

As I explained in Part 1, the recent Southern Baptist Convention has officially condemned the Alt-Right movement.  Labeling the Alt-Right as “racist” and “white supremacists” and proponents of “racial and ethnic hatred” sounds a lot like a typical, unthinking, non-Christian “human rights” group. Was it the knee-jerk reaction about their “racist past” that the Southern Baptists want to rectify in order to exonerate themselves before the world as the now racially-inclusive group? Proudly and confidently, Southern Baptist leader Ed Stetzer declared, “The alt-right is antithetical to the Christian gospel.” Justified at last!

Southern Baptist Theology

So, I was interested in finding out exactly what the Southern Baptist theological basis is for them to say that “the Alt-Right is antithetical to the Christian gospel.” Let’s see what they say. There were a number of points, so I’ll just address four.

Under the Proposed Resolution #10 called “On the Anti-Gospel of Alt-Right White Supremacy” that was finally approved, we come to the first point:

“WHEREAS, Scripture teaches, ‘From one man [God] has made every nationality to live over the whole earth and has determined their appointed times and the boundaries of where they live’ (Acts 17:26); …”1

It is commonly assumed that this verse means that all races (“every nationality”) came from Adam (or Noah). The implication, of course, is that all races have a common origin and all share equally in the same bloodline created by God. I have written extensively on this in God’s Covenant Creation (Book Four) of the Covenant Heritage Series. The Southern Baptist theory is based on a further assumption that the Bible is a universally and racially inclusive story about the “human race.” But the Bible never even alludes to that. God created Adam uniquely and the Bible is the historical record of his race (Genesis 5:1). The Southern Baptists (and all Catholic and Protestant churches) don’t ask, “Was Adam’s race inclusive of all races or is it one among many races?” And if they did ask that question, what does the evidence of the Bible suggest or prove is the best answer of the two possible conclusions?

Take the genealogies from Genesis chapters 5-11. Within those chapters the genealogies comprise about 42% of all the verses. And what do these genealogies tell us? Two things. First, there is a specific family line from Adam to Noah among the other families within the Adamic race. Second, the genealogies imply the same genetic bloodline. Noah, for example, was the same race as Adam. Same genetics – same race. The other races are not even mentioned.

Isn’t this common sense? There are a few attempts at some fantastic (fantasy) theories about how all races came from Adam (or Noah), but I thoroughly debunk them in God’s Covenant Creation,  Book Four. But the common, unfailing and repeatable law of nature is reproduced time after time: kind after kind. Two pure White people, male and female, produce only a White child. Chinese produce Chinese. Black Africans produce black Africans. Every time. The repeatable experience of this law of nature is commonly experienced and understood, but incredibly denied by this theological theory that all races came from Adam. It’s stupid!

But this false point of theology is the basis for the inclusive racial equality movement. Hence, those in the Alt-Right movement are condemned because they believe in racial and political separation. There may not be a lot of professing “Christians” in the Alt-Right, but they have more common sense than a lot of those high-octane theologians out there.

More Theological Assumptions

There are more points that presume to support a racially-inclusive “gospel.” I’ll just briefly mention a few:

“WHEREAS, The Psalmist proclaimed, ‘The earth and everything in it, the world and its inhabitants, belong to the LORD’ (Psalm 24:1) …”

Once again, unfounded, unbiblical presumption about the meanings of “earth” and “world.” These word definitions are handled in Book Four, God’s Covenant Creation. They don’t mean the planet and every person on it!

“WHEREAS, Scripture proclaims that Jesus is purchasing by His blood believers ‘from every tribe and language and people and nation’ (Revelation 5:9) …”

In what context is that phrase used? Revelation was written to and about Israel. This is handled in Book Six, The Biblical Story of Prophecy.

“WHEREAS, We know from our Southern Baptist history the effects of the horrific sins of racism and hatred; and…”

Hey Southern Baptists – do you know what “racism” even means? And who is now hating who? And who is calling the conviction of White people who prefer their own kind over the others “sin”? What law of God is being transgressed here? I John 3:4 defines sin as the transgression of God’s law. The Southern Baptists (and they are not alone) are redefining sin and going beyond what is written in the Bible.

Resolution for the Racists and Deceived

At the conclusion of these points of errant theology, the Southern Baptists made this resolution in part:

“RESOLVED, That we earnestly pray, both for those who advocate racist ideologies and those who are thereby deceived, that they may see their error through the light of the Gospel, repent of these hatreds, and come to know the peace and love of Christ through redeemed fellowship in the Kingdom of God, which is established from every nation, tribe, people, and language.”

Thank you so much that heartfelt, prayerful resolution. It really touched me. So lovingly concerned.

Here is my message to the Southern Baptists and all those who continue to spew forth unwarranted and unprovable theology. You don’t know what you’re talking about or what you so confidently affirm.

Repent! Repent of your lies that continue to lead God’s true Covenant People down the road of destruction and deception. Repent of preaching a false gospel and a false Jesus.

And to the advocates of the Alt-Right movement I say, “You are heading in the right direction. Don’t give up on the Bible and Jesus Christ. What you are seeing and hearing out there in church-land is NOT biblical Christianity.” Do you want to know what the Bible actually says and means? The Bible is about your race – the Caucasian race! It’s your history and heritage book. Click here to take your first step.

_______________

1 All quotes in this article are from:  http://christianitytoday.com/

By Lawrence Blanchard, ND, MDiv

Posted in Modern Christianity | Comments Off on Alt-Right Condemned by Southern Baptists – Part 2